Skip to content
Top of the Ninth

Top of the Ninth

A Review of Ninth Circuit and BIA Decisions by Merle D. Kahn, Esq.

Menu

Primary menu

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact Us

Tag Archives: Warrants

THE COURTS MUST SUPPRESS EVIDENCE OF ALIENAGE IN AN ILLEGAL SEARCH AND SEIZURE OR, NO, ICE CAN’T ASK FOR YOUR PAPERS DURING A BUSINESS RAID

Posted on June 28, 2019 by Merle Kahn — No Comments ↓

Special Blog for 6.14.19 by Merle Kahn, Esq. I’m going to start this blog out with a quotation from this case:  “Our central question is whether the ICE agents were permitted to carry out preplanned mass detentions, interrogations, and arrests Continue reading THE COURTS MUST SUPPRESS EVIDENCE OF ALIENAGE IN AN ILLEGAL SEARCH AND SEIZURE OR, NO, ICE CAN’T ASK FOR YOUR PAPERS DURING A BUSINESS RAID→

Share this:

  • Email
  • Print
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Posted in Constitutional Law, Cross-Appeals and the 10-Year Bar, Exclusionary Rule, Fourth Amendment | Tagged Fourth Amendment, Unreasonable Search and Seizure, Warrants | Leave a reply

Primary Sidebar Widget Area

Recent Posts

  • THE SUPREME COURT’S SOLE CRIM/IMM DECISION FOR THE 2023 TERM: OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE AND “OBSTRUCTION-ADJACENT” CONVICTIONS
  • IN A DECONSTRUCTED COURT SYSTEM, WHICH CIRCUIT’S LAW APPLIES? AND PATEL MAY BE REARING ITS UGLY HEAD
  • CROSS-APPEALS AND THE TEN-YEAR BAR – We are Back Baby!
  • “I’ll Never Be Your Beast of Burden” (Unless You’re a Noncitizen) – Pereida v. Wilkinson
  • THE BIA ADOPTS AN ORIGINAL NOVEL DOCTRINE OF JURISPRUDENCE – TRUTHINESS

Recent Comments

  • Merle Kahn on CROSS-APPEALS AND THE TEN-YEAR BAR – We are Back Baby!
  • Bernice Funk on CROSS-APPEALS AND THE TEN-YEAR BAR – We are Back Baby!
  • Merle Kahn on “I’ll Never Be Your Beast of Burden” (Unless You’re a Noncitizen) – Pereida v. Wilkinson
  • David Wright on “I’ll Never Be Your Beast of Burden” (Unless You’re a Noncitizen) – Pereida v. Wilkinson
  • Merle Kahn on “I’ll Never Be Your Beast of Burden” (Unless You’re a Noncitizen) – Pereida v. Wilkinson

Archives

  • July 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • March 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • June 2020
  • February 2020
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018

Categories

  • Admission
  • Affidavits of Support
  • Aggravated Felonies
  • Appellate Review
  • Asylum
  • Cancellation of Removal
  • Cannabis
  • CAT
  • Categorical Approach
  • Chevron Deference
  • Choice of Law
  • CIMT
  • Constitutional Law
  • Consular Reviewability
  • Controlled Substances
  • Convention Against Torture
  • Convictions
  • Credibility
  • Crime involving moral turpitude
  • Crime of Violence
  • Crimes
  • Cross-Appeals and the 10-Year Bar
  • DACA
  • Due Process
  • Equal Protection Clause
  • Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship
  • Exclusionary Rule
  • Expedited Removal
  • Fifth Amendment
  • First Amendment
  • Fourteenth Amendment
  • Fourth Amendment
  • Habeas
  • Injunction
  • Jurisdiction
  • Lozada
  • Mandatory Detention
  • Marriage Fraud
  • Modified Categorical Approach
  • Motion to Reopen
  • Parole
  • Particular Social Group
  • Particularly Serious Crime
  • Pereira
  • REAL ID
  • Res Judicata
  • Right to Counsel
  • Science
  • SIJS
  • Stop Time Rule
  • Vagueness
  • Venue
  • Withholding of Removal

Subscribe to Top of the Ninth

Disclaimer

This blog is for informational purposes only and should not be viewed as legal advice.

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Email
Copyright © 2025 Top of the Ninth. All Rights Reserved.
Theme: Catch Box by Catch Themes
Scroll Up