Skip to content
Top of the Ninth

Top of the Ninth

A Review of Ninth Circuit and BIA Decisions by Merle D. Kahn, Esq.

Menu

Primary menu

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact Us

Month: January 2021

THE BIA ADOPTS AN ORIGINAL NOVEL DOCTRINE OF JURISPRUDENCE – TRUTHINESS

Posted on January 10, 2021 by Merle Kahn — 1 Comment ↓

The BIA adopts an original jurisprudential doctrine of truthiness in adjudicating CAT claims. Continue reading THE BIA ADOPTS AN ORIGINAL NOVEL DOCTRINE OF JURISPRUDENCE – TRUTHINESS→

Share this:

  • Email
  • Print
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Posted in CAT, Credibility | Tagged BIA, CAT, Credibility, Forensic Evidence, Truthiness | 1 Reply

Primary Sidebar Widget Area

Recent Posts

  • THE SUPREME COURT’S SOLE CRIM/IMM DECISION FOR THE 2023 TERM: OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE AND “OBSTRUCTION-ADJACENT” CONVICTIONS
  • IN A DECONSTRUCTED COURT SYSTEM, WHICH CIRCUIT’S LAW APPLIES? AND PATEL MAY BE REARING ITS UGLY HEAD
  • CROSS-APPEALS AND THE TEN-YEAR BAR – We are Back Baby!
  • “I’ll Never Be Your Beast of Burden” (Unless You’re a Noncitizen) – Pereida v. Wilkinson
  • THE BIA ADOPTS AN ORIGINAL NOVEL DOCTRINE OF JURISPRUDENCE – TRUTHINESS

Recent Comments

  • Merle Kahn on CROSS-APPEALS AND THE TEN-YEAR BAR – We are Back Baby!
  • Bernice Funk on CROSS-APPEALS AND THE TEN-YEAR BAR – We are Back Baby!
  • Merle Kahn on “I’ll Never Be Your Beast of Burden” (Unless You’re a Noncitizen) – Pereida v. Wilkinson
  • David Wright on “I’ll Never Be Your Beast of Burden” (Unless You’re a Noncitizen) – Pereida v. Wilkinson
  • Merle Kahn on “I’ll Never Be Your Beast of Burden” (Unless You’re a Noncitizen) – Pereida v. Wilkinson

Archives

  • July 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • March 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • June 2020
  • February 2020
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018

Categories

  • Admission
  • Affidavits of Support
  • Aggravated Felonies
  • Appellate Review
  • Asylum
  • Cancellation of Removal
  • Cannabis
  • CAT
  • Categorical Approach
  • Chevron Deference
  • Choice of Law
  • CIMT
  • Constitutional Law
  • Consular Reviewability
  • Controlled Substances
  • Convention Against Torture
  • Convictions
  • Credibility
  • Crime involving moral turpitude
  • Crime of Violence
  • Crimes
  • Cross-Appeals and the 10-Year Bar
  • DACA
  • Due Process
  • Equal Protection Clause
  • Exceptional and Extremely Unusual Hardship
  • Exclusionary Rule
  • Expedited Removal
  • Fifth Amendment
  • First Amendment
  • Fourteenth Amendment
  • Fourth Amendment
  • Habeas
  • Injunction
  • Jurisdiction
  • Lozada
  • Mandatory Detention
  • Marriage Fraud
  • Modified Categorical Approach
  • Motion to Reopen
  • Parole
  • Particular Social Group
  • Particularly Serious Crime
  • Pereira
  • REAL ID
  • Res Judicata
  • Right to Counsel
  • Science
  • SIJS
  • Stop Time Rule
  • Vagueness
  • Venue
  • Withholding of Removal

Subscribe to Top of the Ninth

Disclaimer

This blog is for informational purposes only and should not be viewed as legal advice.

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin
  • Email
Copyright © 2025 Top of the Ninth. All Rights Reserved.
Theme: Catch Box by Catch Themes
Scroll Up